Malicious Prosecution

An employee who erased computer data and was later arrested for the crime cannot pursue his claim of malicious prosecution against his former employers. A federal appeals court ruled that the employee could not prove that the company acted without probable cause in turning the case over to the police.

(Deng v. Sears, Roebuck, and Company, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, No. 07-3331)

Attachment	Size
DengvSears.pdf	79.96 KB

Login or register to post comments
Printer-friendly version

Comments

The Magazine — Past Issues

Issues

A federal court has ruled that an employee may pursue her religious discrimination claim against her employer. The employee argued that she could not follow company policy and receive a flu shot because it was against her religion, veganism. The court is allowing the case to proceed, ruling that the employee should be given the opportunity to prove that veganism meets the requirements of religious belief under discrimination statutes.

The Workplace: Legal Issues

Investigations

A California appeals court has ruled that an employee may be legally fired for failing to cooperate with an in internal investigation.

Security Management is the award-winning publication of ASIS International, the preeminent international
organization for security professionals, with more than 38,000 members worldwide.

ASIS International, Inc. Worldwide Headquarters, 1625 Prince Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22314-2818 U.S.A.
703.519.6200 | fax 703.519.6299 | www.asisonline.org

© 2013 Security Management
This site is protected by copyright and trade mark laws under U.S. and International law.
No part of this work may be reproduced without the written permission of Security Management.

Malicious Prosecution

Comments

The Magazine — Past Issues

Related Stories

Religious Discrimination

Investigations