NEWS

Revised VT Report Exposes New Details of Shooting

By Matthew Harwood

A newly revised version of Virginia's official report on the Virginia Tech (VT) massacre provides new details on how police and university officials responded to the initial discovery of the first two shooting victims, reports The New York Times.

The decision by police to allow students to attend class from the residence hall where the first double murder occurred unknowingly put them in the cross hairs of student Cho Seung-Hui .

The report indicates that students who were initially locked down at West Ambler Johnston residence hall, where the first two victims were killed, were later released from the building by the police and allowed to attend their 9 a.m. classes. Two of those students then went to class in Norris Hall, where they were killed by the shooter.

The police released the students living at the residence hall because of a tragically flawed assumption, according to the revised VT report obtained by the Times. "They did not take sufficient action to deal with what might happen if the initial lead proved erroneous," the report states. "The police reported to the university emergency Policy Group that the 'person of interest' probably was no longer on campus."

But the shooter Cho left the residence hall and eventually went on a rampage inside Norris Hall. He murdered 30 more people, including students and teachers. The massacre was the worst on a U.S. university campus in history.

The Times also reports that some university officials informed their own family members of the shooting before the campus was notified. The university president's office was also locked down well before the campus officially learned of the shooting.

At least two members of the university’s Policy Group, which was assembled to manage the crisis, let their own families know of the first two shootings, in the residence hall, more than 90 minutes before the group warned the rest of the campus. The new report also says that the university president’s office was locked down about 30 minutes before a formal warning was issued to the rest of the campus.

Despite the new details of that day, Gov. Tim Kaine and TriData, the company that performed the investigation for Virginia, said these additions did not effect the report's original conclusions and recommendations.


♦ Photo of VT candlelight vigil by alka3en/Flickr

Comments

A Tragic Example of a Gun Free Zone

I think that we, as a nation, have put ourselves at risk of being killed in these "gun free zones".  Establishment of these zones has not, as far as I can tell, prevented deaths, however it has guaranteed that any shooter can use these zones for killing people without fear that any of the people there will be able to defend themselves.  Our latest example, Fort Hood, showed the same problem.  When law abiding people are not permitted to carry firearms legally the only people who benefit are people who want to break the law and kill others.

As a person who has turned 180 degrees on this issue, I'd like to see a national discussion of gun control and how it has helped us and how it has hurt us as a nation.  I believe that a careful, rational discusison of the issue would help us to be safer as a nation.

-Vik Solem

 

 

View Recent News (by day)

 




Beyond Print

SM Online

See all the latest links and resources that supplement the current issue of Security Management magazine.