Security Management
Published on Security Management (http://www.securitymanagement.com)
Presidential Hopefuls on U.S. Security
Matthew Harwood
Created 08/03/2007 - 10:34



    
Wrap-Up?: 
No
Lead Headline?: 
No
Date: 
08/03/2007
By Line: 
Matthew Harwood
Teaser: 

Presidential hopefuls Senator Barak Obama (D-IL) and the former governor of Massachusetts Mitt Romney each made news yesterday offering how they would improve the security of the United States.

Presidential hopefuls Senator Barak Obama (D-IL) and the former governor of Massachusetts Mitt Romney each made news yesterday offering how they would improve the security of the United States.

At a campaign stop in New Hampshire, Romney took shots at the Department of Homeland Security [1] saying it was inefficient and that it needed to be restructured. He said if elected president, he would, according to the Associated Press, make it "smaller, simpler and smarter." Another change Romney would make is switch DHS's emphasis from first response to prevention through intelligence.

But Obama, looking to brandish his national security credentials, made waves in his second major foreign policy [2] address at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, telling the crowd he would order attacks on al Qaeda in Pakistan, with or without Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf's approval, if there was actionable intelligence. Obama said he would also withdraw troops from Iraq so the United States could concentrate on the defeating the Taliban and al Qaeda in the lawless zones throughout Afghanistan and the border regions between Afghanistan and Pakistan.

For more on the speech from the Obama camp, click here [3].

Over at the Washington Post, terrorism and national security experts responded to his speech [4].

Highlights include this remark from Teresita C. Schaffer, Director of the Center for Strategic and International Studies' South Asia program and former U.S. ambassador to Sri Lanka:

His statement that we would be willing to act if President Musharraf isn't, is not dramatically different from the current administration's attitude. Most members of the administration don't like to talk about this, and look on it as an absolute last resort.

Michael Scheuer, the founder of the CIA's Bin Laden Unit, had stinging words regarding Obama's speech:

Senator Obama must have left a couple zeroes off his plan for reinforcements. Two brigades -- which is about 6,000 men -- will not make a lick of difference in Afghanistan, which is a country the size of Texas, with the highest mountains on earth, a hostile population, and a growing Islamist insurgency. If Obama starts talking about 100 brigades -- about 300,000 men -- then the public might be able to assume he means business. Otherwise, he is just blowing smoke.

Scheuer broadened his criticism to include all presidential candidates who say the U.S. military option has not worked. He said U.S. military power has been used "most daintily" in Afghanistan and Iraq and that if this is the best the U.S. military can do, then the U.S. public has been swindled in the amount of taxes they paid to the armed forces over the past 25 years.

For even more coverage of Obama's speech, listen to this report [5] from NPR's All Things Considered.

 

Related Resources: 

Comments


Security Management is the award-winning publication of ASIS International, the preeminent international
organization for security professionals, with more than 38,000 members worldwide.

ASIS International, Inc. Worldwide Headquarters, 1625 Prince Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22314-2818 U.S.A.
703.519.6200 | fax 703.519.6299 | www.asisonline.org

ASIS

© 2013 Security Management
This site is protected by copyright and trade mark laws under U.S. and International law.
No part of this work may be reproduced without the written permission of Security Management.

Powered by: Phase2 Technology

Source URL: http://www.securitymanagement.com/news/presidential-hopefuls-u-s-security

Links:
[1] http://www.wboc.com/Global/story.asp?S=6871529&nav=MXEFM7m7
[2] http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/02/us/politics/02obama.html
[3] http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post_group/ObamaHQ/CpHR
[4] http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2007/08/01/weighing_in_on_obama.html?hpid=topnews
[5] http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=12430148